Toll Free 1-800-300-2919

Real Answers For Those With Mesothelioma

  • Have you or someone you know been diagnosed with mesothelioma?

Real Answers For Those With Mesothelioma

  • Get the Latest Treatment Options
  • Connect with Top Doctors and Specialists
  • Learn About Financial and Legal Assistance
  • See the Latest Information for Veterans

packet of books and informational pamphlets on Mesothelioma

Court Reopens Wrongful Death Suit Over Asbestos Tainted Lawn Fertilizer

A wrongful death suit over asbestos tainted lawn fertilizer has been reopened by a New Jersey appeals court. The suit, brought on behalf of the victim, alleges that the deceased used the popular fertilizer twice a year on his lawn from 1967 to 1980, and that it contributed to his mesothelioma.

According to a report by the New Jersey Law Journal (NJLJ), the manufacturer of the product made the fertilizer with vermiculite ore from a mine in Libby, Montana. The mine contained asbestos. In the suit, brought July 2012, the manufacturer was asked to produce samples of the fertilizer made with vermiculite from Libby. Per NJLJ, “The company responded that it had a sample of Turf Builder containing vermiculite, but it could not determine when it was made or where the vermiculite came from. Expert testimony by four witnesses for the plaintiff was partly or completely excluded by the trial judge,” and the defendant “was granted summary judgment in January 2014.”

Not long after, the manufacturer “discovered” 26 samples of its fertilizer from before 1980 that were made from vermiculite ore obtained from the Montana mine. Counsel for the victim’s estate argued that the samples constituted newly discovered evidence and that the manufacturers “answers to discovery and failure to disclose the samples constituted misrepresentation.” Based on this, counsel moved, in July 2015, to vacate their summary judgment dismissal and requested to restore the case to the active docket.

The first request was denied. However, on appeal, three judges “ruled that the plaintiffs met the conditions for vacating final judgment based on newly discovered evidence which would probably alter the judgment or orders and whether, by due diligence, it could not be discovered in time to move for a new trial. They vacated the final judgment based on the new evidence related to the 26 samples.”

The suit named several other companies that contributed to the victim’s mesothelioma. The suit claimed that the deceased, a cabinetmaker, was exposed to asbestos at these companies while working with packaging and building products. The parties involved entered into a confidential settlement. The victim died in October 2012.

If you have been exposed to asbestos, see your doctor immediately—whether you have symptoms or not. Although there is no cure for mesothelioma, early detection offers better treatment options and outcomes that are more favorable.


Sources ALM Media Properties LLC., 2018. Web. 08 Mar. 2018.

Toutant, Charles. "Court Grants New Chance for Suit Linking Lawn Fertilizer, Mesothelioma." New Jersey Law Journal. ALM Media Properties LLC., 26 Feb. 2018. Web. 08 Mar. 2018.